 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
I'm going to try and be polite here: Re-reading this |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
AshsZ(In Florida) on December 30, 2003 at 2:01 AM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 300 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
I really didn't want to get into this, posted by Seb on December 30, 2003 at 12:23 AM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
post raises some concerns as to the validity of this claim, especially knowing what I have put engines through in the past without failure. I can recall a dyno session where ignition timing was being pulled like MAD. I was seeing timing being pulled dramatically down to single digits, like 6 and 7 degrees of timing.. This was actually on Todd's turbo'd NA engine, of which took a good beating that day. It was pulling timing well above 3600RPM too... I recall seeing datalogs (using the conZult) where timing would get pulled into these sub-10 degree ranges and stay there to redline. The detonation sensing circuit and algorythm goes past the closed loop region of the timing map as I have seen this occurence on a few occasions. That car made a good number of pulls, I believe around 25 or so.. I made appropriate changes to keep this event from happening and that car went on to have a respectable number of miles of heavy detonation, months of abuse, before a rod bearing failed. No melted pistons. I'm really not buying into A. Graham Bell's writeup there... I have a ton of empirical data that disproves that theory with astounding evidence, at least in the VG30DETT.. Didn't he invent the telephone anyway? LOL
[ ashleypowers.com ]
[ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] [ Zemulator Information Sheet ] [ Z1 Motorsports Website ]
.JPG) Enthusiasts soon understand each other. --W. Irving.
Are you an enthusiast?
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
03:03:40 12/30/03
